Web Only / Features » November 3, 2017
If Berniecrats Were British: How Jeremy Corbyn’s Momentum Won the Soul of the Labour Party
Momentum continues to play a central role in organizing the Left in the U.K.’s Labour party.
I remember a very strong sensation of being in a group of very good, very committed, very genuine people who I've never known before, with one or two exceptions. The feeling of being attacked and the feeling of it kind of being down to us. There was a constant feeling of, "It's us that are going to make this happen or it isn't going to happen."
While Americans were still adjusting to the realities of a Trump presidency, across the Atlantic, the United Kingdom faced a snap general election last spring, pitting the leftist Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn against Prime Minister Theresa May. Corbyn’s takeover of Labour was aided by young activists, many of whom formed an organization named Momentum to support Corbyn’s bid for leadership and his agenda.
Momentum defended Corbyn from attacks from within and without the party while also playing a central role in the Labour Party’s unexpected success in June’s election. While in London, I spoke with Momentum’s Rachel Wood about the organization’s beginnings and where it is now.
Sarah Jaffe: Start off with when you started to get involved.
Rachel Wood: I was on the left, and I was reasonably active in politics but I wasn't in the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn was actually my MP, but I'd never joined the Labour Party because I just didn't see any way through which you could actually change things for the better within the Labour Party. When they lost the election in 2015, it was quite devastating, it was a blow even though I wasn't a party member.
And when [Corbyn] threw his hat in the ring and decided to enter the race that was a great moment. Him standing galvanized a lot of people. It was quite spontaneous at that time and it just took on a life of its own. It was clear early on that they were getting lots of volunteers for the phone banking, to an extent that hadn't really been seen before. I went phone banking a few times in that campaign, though I wasn't that heavily involved in it.
In October 2015, after he became the leader, I joined Labour and I joined Momentum very soon afterwards, about a week after. That was quite a few weeks after Momentum had been founded.
Sarah: What was Momentum like in the beginning?
Rachel: I found it incredibly positive from the beginning. In those early months it was very chaotic. The state of the project itself was very vulnerable, Jeremy was very vulnerable, his team were trying to work out how to get things going, and as Momentum we were quite cut off from them. And we were getting attacked quite a lot, by people on the Right of the party, the media and stuff like that.
I remember a very strong sensation of being in a group of very good, very committed, very genuine people who I've never known before, with one or two exceptions. The feeling of being attacked and the feeling of it kind of being down to us. There was a constant feeling of, “It's us that are going to make this happen or it isn't going to happen.”
Over that whole first year there were various experiences of occasionally thinking maybe somebody else has got something covered, and finding out they don't—actually they've got even more problems than we do. And I feel like that bound us together as Momentum.
As it went on, that whole first year, I think it was quite difficult because overall the project, it didn't seem to be progressing very much. It wasn't progressing in terms of changing public opinion very much, we weren't making any inroads to any significant changes in the Labour Party. There was quite a lot of despondency, really. But in spite of that there was always a very special kind of energy and determination to make things happen.
Sarah: What were the numbers like in Momentum at first?
Rachel: In a way, you could say it kind of started with a database, because during in that first week of the campaign they asked people if they'd be happy to be contacted again by the campaign of Jeremy Corbyn. That became the database of Momentum, so that means that when it started, we had a database of around 150,000. They were supporters but they weren't members, we didn't have a membership structure until April or May of 2016.
Then you had all of these Momentum groups springing up spontaneously around the country. That was kind of chaotic and it was quite hard for us to work out what was happening and to try to establish some sort of system to provide support for those people and try to regularize it. We hadn't worked out to what extent we were trying to show leadership to those groups or where we were merely facilitating.
We got to around 70-80 groups quite quickly, but then in some cases there were groups formed and there were internal divisions or groups formed and after a couple meetings people stopped coming. When we became a membership organization we got 4,000 people who became members. At that stage there was a bit of a sense of disappointment as well.
Because Jeremy Corbyn was leader of the Labour Party, hundreds of thousands joined the party. We formed an organization on the back of it, and it's only got 4,000 members? There's a bit of disappointment. And that changed quite a lot in the summer of 2016 when they tried to get rid of Jeremy. As a result of that loads of people joined Momentum. And the local Labour parties shut down for two months. So people, they saw the point of Momentum—an organization that was necessary to keep things on the road.
So there was a massive influx of people into Momentum. It took membership up to around 18,000 within two, three weeks. There was an expansion of groups as well. And the next big expansion was during and after the general election, we got a few more thousand. And then a trickle of people coming. Then recently, after the party conference, we got several hundred additional members. So at the moment we've got 170 or 180 groups and 31,000 members. A few hundred thousand supporters on the database, but they're not paying members.
Sarah: I want to go back to the despondency period–similar accusations were being thrown at Jeremy Corbyn that were thrown at Bernie Sanders. I guess my question is which were the hardest ones to grapple with?
Rachel: The stuff about misogyny was like…it was quite obvious that an awful lot of it was in bad faith and an awful lot of it was hypocritical. And misogyny does exist on the left, and when it does exist, it's bad. And sometimes it's quite glaring when you can see the contradiction between people's politics and the way that they actually behave. That still does exist on the Left. It's quite difficult to get it right between calling out the hypocrisy of the people making accusations in many cases in bad faith, but also being quite serious internally about actually trying to address these issues.
Sarah: And then we get to the moment where the Labour Right decides to blow up the party. Did you see that coming, and what was the response as Momentum in that moment?
Rachel: From the beginning it was clear that there was a significant group of MPs who just wanted it to end. They have very significant, privileged access to the media. So they could create an echo chamber which served to destabilize Jeremy Corbyn's team, making it very difficult for him to do stuff, basically.
Before these big events you'd see people making statements that suggested that they were kind of preparing something. The second was the local elections in May 2016 when again, Labour did better than expected. Basically they held on to all of the seats from a high point four years ago and they won in London quite well. Again, there was this whole chitter-chatter before about like, “Oh he'll have to go if he doesn't get a good result,” and senior party officials concerned that Labour's going to be doing badly. But again it didn't happen.
And then there was the Brexit referendum and they went for it. But it had a politicizing effect on the entire movement. For a lot of activists those events framed their political perspective and will do so for many years. It played its role in a way even though it was quite unpleasant at the time. It woke people up in a significant way, it wasn't just enough to vote for Jeremy Corbyn and then hopefully wait for him to get elected and to make nice policies. They actually had to get involved and make it happen.
Sarah: Tell me about how the day-to-day organizing work was going before and after that turning point.
Rachel: Ninety to 95 percent of what we did in the first year was basically responding to crisis after crisis. It was very difficult to develop any kind of strategic perspective, we didn't have our own systems in place. And then internally there were different people in different groups with fundamentally different strategic perspectives about what Momentum should be doing and what type of organization Momentum should be. And so for example, as soon as we won that leadership election in 2016, then all of that internal stuff blew up just a few weeks after that.
Late 2016 was when we started becoming more oriented towards organizing within the Labour Party. We still had a lot of aspirations that weren’t met. We always wanted to do training sessions for activists, but we never actually started that until the election this year. Then a few Bernie Sanders people came over. Until then we actually hadn't done any activist training. But then the election provided a lot of opportunities to do those sorts of things.
Sarah: So then Theresa May called the election, assuming that she would win a bigger majority…and the opposite happened.
Rachel: There were people who were more optimistic. There were also people who were less optimistic, but it had a unifying effect. I think we'd started unifying a few weeks before the election was called, because Corbyn’s policy team started putting out lots of very strong policies that kind of reminded everybody why they were in it in the first place.
Sarah: When did you notice the difference in the conversations that you were having, that people were having on the doors during the election? When did you start to feel it?
Rachel: Probably around three or four weeks into the election. A lot of activists were messaging us, saying, “We can do it. We can win this seat, we can win that seat.” So it was accumulating anecdotal stuff, obviously the polls were getting a lot better. Even then, the result of the actual election is still better than what I would have predicted. There are other people who were more optimistic, but still.
Sarah: Was there one result, one constituency result, that really shocked you?
Rachel: Kensington. Canterbury. Portsmouth. Those are probably the biggest ones. The biggest, in terms of the places where we gave the most support to. We gave support to, for example, to Battersea. Which again at the beginning of the election was a long way behind. [Battersea] had a really good candidate, so we put quite a lot in there and it was clear after a few weeks of really sustaining a lot of activists, mobilizing, stuff like that, it was really special when the results started coming in.
The exit polls are usually pretty accurate, but there was like a two-second thing before we realized what he was saying, because it was like “Conservatives are the largest party.” And it was like a two-second gap, “But no overall majority” and we just went crazy.
Sarah: Tell me what it's been like since the election. What have you been working on?
Rachel: We're still doing this Unseat campaign. That is campaigning days with high-profile Conservative ministers, like we did Boris Johnson in Uxbridge, Iain Duncan Smith in Chingford & Woodford Green and Justine Greeling in Putney. So that's been pretty good. They've been getting pretty good numbers.
We're trying to sustain the train-the-trainers scheme, so we're training up a lot of activists so they can then deliver the trainings themselves. The party conference was quite a big deal, although a lot of the key decisions had already been taken before the conference started. But the numbers of delegates that were there and the overall atmosphere of the conference was incredible.
Sarah: Tell me a little more about who Momentum's base is. Who are the people forming groups, doing a lot of the volunteering? You only have a small number of paid staff, right?
Rachel: It's increased so now it's like around 15 staff, some of those are temporary. There's a bit of a demographic difference between the people at the office and the grassroots activists. On the whole, people on the staff are a lot younger than a lot of the grassroots activists. A lot of the grassroots activists are people who are coming back to the party after having left, over Iraq and stuff like that.
If you go to a lot of Momentum groups there are not that many younger people. But there are a lot of younger people who are Momentum members who are increasingly active in the Labour Party through Young Labour, but they're not really acting as Momentum.
We need to think about ways to engage different groups of people. I think it's very difficult to have one particular type of space that engages the whole diversity of our society, really.
Sarah: What's one thing that people who aren't familiar with Momentum should know about it?
Rachel: I think it's the first ever organization to achieve things on a distinct range of activities within quite a short space of time. So in terms of mobilizing electorally, organizing in the Labour Party, but also reaching way outside the Labour Party through a lot of social media. Doing those three things quite successfully, I would say, that's the most significant thing. A lot of the things we did weren't actually new ideas, but for various reasons we were able to make them real.
There were always people on the Left who talked about having a social media strategy but they never had one, they didn't know how. Or there wasn't the right collection of people to make it real. But Momentum and Jeremy Corbyn kind of allowed that to happen, because it just brought those people in. It generated that belief that something was achievable, really, which led a lot of people to go the extra mile.
Interviews for Resistance is a project of Sarah Jaffe, with assistance from Laura Feuillebois and support from the Nation Institute. It is also available as a podcast on iTunes. Not to be reprinted without permission.
Help Support Our Fall Fundraising Drive
Here’s a sobering fact: Over the past 20 years, journalism has lost jobs at a faster rate than the coal mining industry. Far too many excellent publications have disappeared completely.
But because of supporters like you, In These Times has been able to walk a different path. We are not managed by a corporate parent company, nor are we dependent on one benevolent philanthropist. Instead, we are supported by individual donations from you and thousands of other readers like you.
This is our promise to you: We’ll keep publishing as long as you keep supporting In These Times. Please, make a tax-deductible donation today to help keep In These Times going strong.
Sarah Jaffe is a former staff writer at In These Times and author of Necessary Trouble: Americans in Revolt , which Robin D.G. Kelley called “The most compelling social and political portrait of our age.” You can follow her on Twitter @sarahljaffe.
if you like this, check out:
- Trump’s Betrayal of the Kurds Is Terrible, But the Answer Is Not Endless War
- How the DCCC’s “Blacklist” Could Blow Up in the Democratic Establishment’s Face
- The Corporate Media Failed to Warn Us About the Trump Admin’s Attack on LGBTQ Workers
- The Labour Left Is Poised to Take Power If It Can Move Past One Roadblock: Brexit
- Only Bernie’s Green New Deal Answers Greta’s Call for Action